Commons:Deletion requests/mobile tracking/archive/2021-31

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 1

Per COM:FOP#Nepal: non-free (2010) statue.

Eleassar ^(t/p) 09:31, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can any one suggest me is there any solution for this? What if I obtain any letter from the owner of the statue? is there any format of such letter? -Krish Dulal (talk) 02:39, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This would be appreciated, however the permission to freely license these photos should be obtained from the sculptor (author) of the statue, not from the owner. Please follow the guidelines at COM:OTRS. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 07:39, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue 2

See prior discussion. Unveiled in 1992 and built/designed by Kamal Jain, CEO of Hilltake Group of Companies. Lest Nepal's copyright law is changed to allow commercial use of images of copyrighted artistic works without artists' prior authorization.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:35, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 00:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue

The statue was completed in 2010. There is no freedom of panorama in Nepal, permission from the creator is needed as he/she is unlikely to be dead for 50 years.

A1Cafel (talk) 09:16, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. For those that might be COM:DM, the other subjects are out of COM:Scope. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Kailashnath Mahadev Statue

Not OK per COM:FOP Nepal

— Tulsi 24x7 06:37, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the nominator. These images clearly aren't PD. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:23, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 11:12, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previous deletion request, resulted to keep

Files in Category:Simferopol Railway Station

The same reasoning as in this RfD. The station is in Crimea - the territory claimed by both Ukraine and Russia. While in Russia there is Freedom of Panorama for buildings, in Ukraine there is not. Per precautionary principle we need to apply the most strict law - that'd be Ukrainian in the case. Some or perhaps even all files here were already deleted in the past but were batch undeleted when Russian Federation's law allowed FoP for buildings.--BaseSat (talk) 21:13, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BaseSat (talk) 21:13, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep File:SimfiropolTrainStation-6.jpg - I do not see architecture or sculpture there.--Anatoliy (talk) 21:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Artworks are not just buildings and sculptures. Can ya forge such a lantern for me? I'd place it on my balcony ;) --BaseSat (talk) 00:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

+ Мои фотографии - Вокзал.Симферополь 03.JPG и Вокзал.Симферополь 04.JPG - были загружены в сентябре 2012 года в рамках украинской части конкурса "Вики любит памятники" с использованием соотстветствующего загрузочного шаблона. Информацию о загрузке именно в рамках конкурса можно увидеть на страницах этих фотографий. Украинская сторона в лице жюри конкурса не предъявила никаких претензий к фотографиям. Я искренне не понимаю, почему претензии могли возникнуть сейчас. Мне кажется, логично для начала обратиться с претензиями к тем людям, которые отвечали за формирование конкурсных (загрузочных) списков, а не к юзерам, которые руководствовались этими списками, отправляя фотографии на конкурс. Екатерина Борисова (talk) 22:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This project is ridiculous. No one in their right mind will sue Wikimedia or any other organization for that matter simply because an image of a railway station appears on a website's servers. DDima 22:15, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but these are not valid arguments. --BaseSat (talk) 00:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep At the moment in this territory is applying only copyright law of Russian Federation --Butko (talk) 07:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
But per Ukrainian law it isn't so. And Ukraine's position in the conflict is backed up by many countries including the USA, where Wikimedia Commons is located. --BaseSat (talk) 00:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Поезжайте в Симферополь и расскажите там кому-нибудь об этом – думаю, мы вас больше не увидим, и это к лучшему, наверное: меньше работы по переносу фотографий будет. С тем же успехом можно "превентивно" применять эстонские законы к объектам, расположенным в Печорах, поскольку Печорский район формально остаётся предметом вялотекущего территориального спора между Эстонией и Россией. --Alexander (talk) 19:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Однако сервера, где размещены эти фото, расположены в США. Поэтому здесь применяется законодальство США. А они признают Крым украинским. Так что поезжайте в Вашингтон, убедите господина Обаму, что Крым ваш, тогда поговорим.--Anatoliy (talk) 19:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Это не повод для флуда на политические темы, тем более, что лично я видеть Крым российским совершенно не хочу. Если здесь применяются только и исключительно американские законы, то они вообще не регламентируют копирайт за пределами территории США. Если речь идёт о местных законах, то они на сегодняшний день в Крыму российские – это факт, который мне лично (как, видимо, и Вам) не нравится, но он есть, и спорить с ним глупо. --Alexander (talk) 20:43, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Afaik there are currently some plans for establishing commercial FoP in Ukraine. Anybody know the status at the moment? --A.Savin 10:38, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It will be hearing in parliament maybe next month.--Anatoliy (talk) 12:02, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Увидел пока одно своё фото. Это: File:Железнодорожный вокзал в Симферополе.JPG. Меня интересует причина, по которой файл выставлен на удаление? Alexander (talk) 19:09, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
На фото изображено здание вокзала в симферополе (К.О.) Крым сейчас принадлежит Украине по мнению одних стран, и Российской Федерации по мнению других стран. Если рассматривать фото с точки зрения российского законодательства, то начиная 1 октября 2014 с фото всё ок, если же рассматривать с точки зрения украиского законодательства то для публикации такого фото с разрешеним на коммерческое использование требуется разрешение от архитектора здания. На Викискладе действует превентивный принцип, по этому следует рассматривать ситуацию с точки зрения более строгого законодательства, которым в данном случае является украинское. --BaseSat (talk) 00:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
На Викискладе полно изображений различных украинских зданий. Никаких разрешений на публикацию фото от архитекторов естественно нет. Например вокзал в Киеве (File:Kiev-Passazhirskiy railway station, Kiev, Ukraine.jpg) или это. Проблема высосана из пальца.Alexander (talk) 08:42, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Не переживайте, на материковой Украине BaseSat орудует не менее интенсивно. --A1 (talk) 11:26, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
We can support FoP new regulations in Ukrainian law here: ht tp://freepanorama.org.ua/ --Halavar (talk) 19:18, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Crimea is currently using Russian law. In addition, there is not much to copyright on many of these pictures. Yann (talk) 12:58, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: And what about last paragraph of Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Russia? It states as per precautionary principle, images of knowingly unfree Crimean buildings should not be uploaded to Commons.--Anatoliy (talk) 13:07, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Simferopol Railway Station

All files show exterior and interior architecture of this Crimean railway station. There is no freedom of panorama of any sort in Ukraine. While the region is under de facto administration of Russian Federation, according to COM:FOP Russia: Following the Commons precautionary principle, images of knowingly unfree Crimean buildings should not be uploaded to Commons. See Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2014/09#Buildings in Crimea. And unfortunately, architect w:Alexey Dushkin is not yet dead for more than 70 years.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:00, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Simferopol Railway Station building was erected in 1951, when Crimea was administrated by RSFSR. —Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:11, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Well-Informed Optimist If so, then in theory they join Ukrainian public domain at 1 Jan 2022, aren't they? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:00, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well, now it's 2022, we can Keep. Lesless (talk) 14:12, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, I said below. The building is now PD even in Ukraine. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 15:26, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Well-Informed Optimist why do we calculate from the date of erection but not the period of life of the architect en:Alexey Dushkin? rubin16 (talk) 14:31, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am calculating nothing. The building was erected before 1954, when Crimea was still part of Russia, where there is freedom of panorama. —Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:59, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, yes, it wasn’t you. rubin16 (talk) 16:05, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WIO. --A.Savin 17:40, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per previous nomination.--Anatoliy (talk) 17:41, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Well-Informed Optimist, A.Savin, and Ahonc: however, that is not the case as indicated on Russian FOP guideline at COM:FOP Russia. Again to highlight: Following the Commons precautionary principle, images of knowingly unfree Crimean buildings should not be uploaded to Commons. See Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2014/09#Buildings in Crimea. Also what is only OK are photos made before February 19, 1954 (not buildings). "Neverless photowork created in Crimea before February 19, 1954 is the subject of the Russian law." Note that the wording used is "photowork" and not "architectural work". If the entire paragraph needs to be modified or removed, then it must be discussed elsewhere (COM:VPC for instance). There are also cases of deleted building images at Category:Crimean FOP cases/deleted. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:26, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment As 1951+71(I always +1 for these "copyright terms" because I don't know which country don't rule it as "until the end of the year")=2022, I agree to temporary delete them for 5 months, and automatically restore on 1 Jan 2022, but then I wonder if we can avoid such "temporary deletions" or not, based on "utilitarian objects" as mentioned in COM:FOP Ukraine section? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:21, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Liuxinyu970226: the building is not purely utilitarian. It has distinct architectural characteristics (not to mention that an architect designed it, not an engineering firm of some sort). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:55, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep File:УЖЕкрым.симферополь.12.20 - panoramio.jpg — I think the Simferopol Railway Station is not the main object of the photo. Maybe the red-white zebra is. =) Russian name of the file also don't contain any word referred to raiway station — "YET Crimea.Simferopol.12.20". So it can be de minimis. --Brateevsky {talk} 13:24, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per IAR - simply not worth the mechanical effort to delete all of these and restore them a few months later (along with readding them to articles), when our DR backlog is 9 months long and wasting admin time here means not resolving more pressing copyright violations in a timely manner. Just run out the clock and close as "keep" in 2022. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:52, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@King of Hearts: In this case, URAA might be another matter against a valid kept decision? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:17, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Liuxinyu970226: buildings are not bound for URAA, as U.S. has freedom of panorama for buildings. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:44, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
So, I think there will have even no de minimis problems after 6 days, nothing to not legally keep them. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:33, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Категорически Keep, нужно руководствоваться существующим делам по Крыму, в частности, по его нахождению в составе России, где ограничений свободы панорамы нету, кроме памятников и мемориальных табличек. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 10:57, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per previous decision of User:Yann, Crimea is currently using Russian law.. --Ellywa (talk) 23:31, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Akhil Bhartiya Kshatriya Mahasabha.jpg

Commons:Derivative works from poster. Should be blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and non-notable event. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:41, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ttc crew 2014-06-21 23-40.jpg

Unused group photo with no explanation of importance. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 09:50, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:45, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The hoff loves dogs 2013-08-02 22-49.jpg

Unused photo of unexplained significance. Little or no educational value. Malcolma (talk) 11:43, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:49, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Car in Winter Weather.jpg

Too close to be of any use, sat in the unidentified automobiles categories with no further categories, cannot see how this is in scope, thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 13:52, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:55, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Al-Dewan Family.png

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:56, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Samprati dynesty 2014-05-04 14-25.jpeg

hardly own work, probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 09:10, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unless actual source and free license status can be shown. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:29, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:24, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Woodshop 2014-06-22 09-52.jpg

no description, unidentified object, not in project scope Fl.schmitt (talk) 19:16, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:44, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tour La Marseillaise 2.jpg

The building was completed in 2018 by Jean Nouvel (1945–). There is no freedom of panorama in France, thus permission from him is required A1Cafel (talk) 07:13, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 22:03, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tour La Marseillaise 4.jpg

The building was completed in 2018 by Jean Nouvel (1945–). There is no freedom of panorama in France, thus permission from him is required A1Cafel (talk) 07:13, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 22:03, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tour La Marseillaise 5.jpg

The building was completed in 2018 by Jean Nouvel (1945–). There is no freedom of panorama in France, thus permission from him is required A1Cafel (talk) 07:13, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 22:03, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tour La Marseillaise.jpg

The building was completed in 2018 by Jean Nouvel (1945–). There is no freedom of panorama in France, thus permission from him is required A1Cafel (talk) 07:13, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 22:03, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Satmar mourning death of R' Shmuel Auerbach.png

Placard from 2018 - the death of Shmuel Auerbach (Q3923981). Not in public domain. -- Geagea (talk) 13:06, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dflasher072 (talk · contribs)

Out of project scope and COM:PENIS

A1Cafel (talk) 17:19, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:22, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Female genitals seen from below.jpg

Out of project scope and COM:VAGINA A1Cafel (talk) 17:25, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Too many of this Out of Scope pics are uploaded here. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 18:02, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:23, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cmppp (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: what new could be added to existing collection of explicit materials?

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 04:52, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cmppp (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. E4024 (talk) 05:00, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:33, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cmppp (talk · contribs)

Out of project scope and COM:PENIS. New, low-quality and unused images.

A1Cafel (talk) 17:26, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:32, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]