Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/02/09

Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 9th, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Elizeu Martins (serial copyright violator). Gunnex (talk) 14:20, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 14:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is nor relevant for any articles. It is uploaded by mistake. Please delete it. Jishnuomanakuttan (talk) 19:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 22:02, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kk-nursultan-nazarbayev.ogg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PNG format, probably a screenshot. Bigger copies on the web. Yann (talk) 23:28, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 16:27, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, this picture is a mirrored and retouched version of this image. Ricardo Esteban Gutierrez (talk) 11:29, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Yann; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 19:52, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

empty category Yiyi (talk) 12:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Fastily; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 19:53, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amelie.leclerc1234 (talk · contribs)

edit

Personality, small to medium size, no EXIF data, user with bad history.

Yann (talk) 22:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Amelie.leclerc1234 (talk · contribs)

(see above)

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:36, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:34, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No description, meaningless title, no useful category, out of scope. And EXIF data says "(c) 2012 Clemens Vasters. All rights reserved." Yann (talk) 00:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Stefan. Green Giant (talk) 00:00, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:01, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unidentifiable, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:56, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:01, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:01, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:02, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:02, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase el alcance del proyecto: imagen personal no usada en ningún proyecto. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:02, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:03, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope: unused personal image. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:03, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase el alcance del proyecto. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:03, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:04, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:13, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:04, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase el alcance del proyecto. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:05, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase el alcance del proyecto. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:05, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader claims authorship whereas metadatos information states:
Copyright Olivia Peguero Art Autor:Olivia Peguero Art Inc., Olivia Anna (Cookie) (talk) 02:15, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:06, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:16, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:06, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:06, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adrielito2015 (talk · contribs)

edit

Véase el alcance del proyecto.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Green Giant (talk) 00:07, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wasim Zac (talk · contribs)

edit

Copyright violation; found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:08, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:08, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:20, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:08, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a photograph of a television screen. See COM:DW. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The capture is from my own video recording which I filmed using my Sony handicam live at meeting itself. I honestly don't recall if I was in front of the hall or pointing at one of the screens in the hall at that moment though.This picture was produced by capturing a snapshot from a personal video recording, and therefore I believe I am the rightful owner of it. --K.shadpour (talk) 03:30, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The uploader appears to be in the photo and is therefore unlikely to be the author of the photo. Green Giant (talk) 00:10, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:24, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:11, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PeterSvoboda (talk · contribs)

edit

Please see our project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:24, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:11, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:12, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:12, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:28, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:13, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

jfjvvvhhhhvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvfhfhhfhfhffgtgftf ftftthcjxjuxjxhxxvuduuddududududhdhhdhdhddyydydyyxh 73.17.117.80 16:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Was ist falsch an diesem Bild ? Moko1998

Gar nichts. De728631 (talk) 21:14, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nonsense nomination. Green Giant (talk) 23:44, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file not work of Пэйнчик. Esetok (talk) 18:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

uploaded by Xocolatl with a clearly inappropriate license - 1910 + unknown author doesn't = PD-old-100 --91.89.136.62 18:23, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Yann at 19:32, 9 February 2015. Green Giant (talk) 23:47, 15 February 2015 (UTC) Green Giant (talk) 23:47, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I could be mistaken, but I'm pretty sure this is a screenshot from the TV show, not something that the user took when he/she happened to be on set. The white bar over to the right side doesn't look like something that you would see from a digital camera, but does look like something you would see if you took a screenshot and pasted it into Paint. (Regrettably, the show is no longer available on Amazon, so I can't go check for sure that it's a screenshot from the show.) UserB (talk) 22:22, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everyone, You are not mistaken UserB, this is a screenshot! It's a shame you can't watch the episode yet, it was really worth it... Maybe if you've searched some torrent sites you'd be rewarded. Anyway, when i posted this picture, the wiki's entry was more than "spartan" regarding details about this "would-be" TV show, so i took the liberty to freeze the most appropriate (by me of course!) scene, the scene were all protagonists were simultaneously together, about the point were the first real mystery would unravel... Now, if you don't like it, or you think it offends you in anyway, please, flag my picture... It is not something i would mind, and maybe you know better than me (most probably :) ). I only uploaded in the spirit of a free-public domain library like this wiki claims to be! Anyway, enjoy my friend :) kounelii (talk) 15:08, 10 February 2015 (CET+2)


Deleted: This screenshot can only be free if the copyright holder licenses it or releases it into the public domain. Green Giant (talk) 23:58, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the author and Its my choice not to keep this image for web portal Nimeshparis (talk) 23:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request within 7 days of upload. Green Giant (talk) 23:54, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free image unused for more than 7 days. 2602:306:CC2E:EFB0:799C:A198:6E5:81F7 03:24, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Close unless regular user takes responsibility. Nomination by open proxy, now blocked. --Abd (talk) 03:14, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There is no need to take responsibility, as IP's concerns are valid. — Revi 06:24, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete COM:TOYS. — Revi 06:24, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per Revi and Stefan. Green Giant (talk) 00:16, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 03:39, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On Commons phrase this as "unused personal photo", please, because notability is no policy here, but "out of scope" is a good deletion reason.  DeleteBe..anyone (talk) 22:20, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:17, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was accidentally uploaded in TIF format. The exact image has been uploaded in jpeg (see File:1875 20C Twenty Cents (Judd-1407,Pollock-1550).jpg) Godot13 (talk) 03:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request within 7 days of upload. Green Giant (talk) 00:17, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1. File:Tanjong Pagar railway station.jpg

2. File:Welcome sign at Tanjong Pagar.jpg

See this discussion at Help desk. I processed the ticket; but no response from the copyright holder. Now uploader stated on my talk page that author refused the permission. Since these two files are very old uploads, I prefer a normal DR. Jee 04:24, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete I was the uploader of the images, and I initiated the steps to rectify the permission issues of these two files. As the nominator stated, the author declined to license the images under a free license. Despite not meeting the criteria for speedy deletion, I think the fact that the images had been here for a long time with no proper permission warrants that deletion to be carried out expediently to respect the copyright of the author.--Joshua (talk) 16:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:18, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dj BFZ (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 06:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:19, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no educational value - tiny 1kb image - same uploader uploaded 2 high-res images of this same man with EXIF INeverCry 06:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:19, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible coyvio - blurry photo of another photo INeverCry 06:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:19, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient copyright declaration - The watermark demonstrates that this photograph is from someone else NearEMPTiness (talk) 06:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Green Giant (talk) 00:22, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ordianarypeople (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 06:18, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:22, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lhyx (talk · contribs)

edit

tiny blurry thumbs (the biggest is 8kb) - no educational value & possible copyvios

INeverCry 06:23, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:23, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 06:25, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:23, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional image - also small w/ no EXIF so possible copyvio INeverCry 06:29, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:24, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 06:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:24, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AdamMuslim052 (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope - promotional images/logos

INeverCry 06:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:25, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KLHolbrook (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope

INeverCry 06:42, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:25, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for monuments. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very very low quality, unlikely to be used for educational purposes Gbawden (talk) 07:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, out of scope IMO Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Gbawden: Why is this file out of scope? Jarble (talk) 19:41, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry should have been more specific. See COM:PENIS. There are enough penis photos already, unless the concensus is that there are not enough with a ring on it like this one Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from [2] LudwigSK (talk) 07:29, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ricardeoliveira (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions (Facebook), missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Ricardeoliveira (Facebook-grabber). File:Parada Angélica DC.jpg eventual taken from (an old version) Google Streetview.

Gunnex (talk) 07:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ricardeoliveira (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP and 1st nomination, considering User talk:Ricardeoliveira (Facebook-grabber).

Gunnex (talk) 20:27, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 01:22, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leonardo Beck (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Leonardo Beck (Panoramio/Google Streetview/etc.). File:E. E. Américo Dias Pereireira 01.jpg + File:"Maria Fumaça" (Três Corações).jpg most likely grabbed from Google Streetview. All files uploaded in a row on 07.01.2015 and are related to Brazilian city pt:Três Corações.

Gunnex (talk) 07:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used, poor resolution ; best SVG resolution available. Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 08:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Davitavyan

edit

These images were all uploaded by Davitavyan. I believe they should be deleted because of their extremly poor PNG quality.

All files lack categorization. Seems to be kind of test upload of new user.

All the files are unused (and rather not able to be used anywhere), and there is no advantage to convert it to good SVG.

sarang사랑 07:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Juggler2005 (talk) 08:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used, poor resolution ; best SVG resolution available. Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 08:59, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

picture own work but copyright of this poster unknown Motopark (talk) 09:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abdeljalil chaib (talk · contribs)

edit

For the user uploaded clearly non-free photos, I'm nominating his/her other very small pictures.

Juggler2005 (talk) 09:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality ({{BadJPG}}), replaced by File:LY-156,735 structure.svg. Leyo 10:13, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 10:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Selfie uploaded for repeatedly-deleted autobio en:Prince Alsina. JohnCD (talk) 10:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

was already published in 2011 on the web: http://www.albdreams.net/kulla-e-sali-berishes/ Albinfo (talk) 10:22, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

article says that image was taken by German photographer Jutta Benzenberg --Albinfo (talk) 10:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image grabed from the web - was already published in 2011 , original version here: https://www.shqiperia.com/Femra-shqiptare-skllave-e-deshires-per-ekzistencen!.13459/ with better visible date here: http://www.forumivirtual.net/diskutime-shoqrore-11/femra-shqiptare-skllave-e-deshires-per-ekzistencen-31776/ Albinfo (talk) 10:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

only serves to illustrate user's autobio on enwiki 145.100.116.29 10:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not in use any more. INeverCry 00:43, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 10:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image available http://www.sureyyaberfe.com/ - subject is a poet from Turkey. -- Deadstar (msg) 10:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no author, no correct license JurgenNL (talk) 11:39, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ssantirt (talk · contribs)

edit

unused personal photos, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 11:54, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:56, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

TV screenshot: copyvio Gyrostat (talk) 12:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:22, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:23, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Even that the author of the novel died 1942 this blub is probably written by another person and is probably copyrighted Raymond 13:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from [3] LudwigSK (talk) 13:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-trivial logo, we need a written permieeion for this. See COM:OTRS for instructions. El Grafo (talk) 13:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a derivative of a logo used by Vintage High School [4]. We'd probably need a written permission from the creator/copyright holder of the original logo. See COM:OTRS for details/instructions. El Grafo (talk) 13:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be an early, now obsolete version of File:Darstellung der Bevölkerungsentwicklung sowie der Bevölkerungsdichte der Gemeinde Adelsried (1840 bis 2012).jpg El Grafo (talk) 13:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious license, no evidence, that the photo had been made by 1930. Sealle (talk) 13:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of free license. Sealle (talk) 13:51, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of free license on source site. Sealle (talk) 13:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used, poor resolution ; best SVG resolution available. Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 13:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright problems - see https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diskussion:Sivan_Meller Eingangskontrolle (talk) 14:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo has terrible quality; I doubt that the Flickr user owns this image. 1989 14:16, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; personal, unused 1989 14:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; personal, unused 1989 14:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Luizeduardocostalucas (serial copyright violator). Last "living" file. Gunnex (talk) 14:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions (Facebook), missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:VitorEmanuelCarvalhoPeixoto (serial copyright violator/Panoramio+Flickr grabber)

Gunnex (talk) 15:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iamthebest052 (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Junior chacon (talk · contribs)

edit

Small res, no EXIF.

Juggler2005 (talk) 12:10, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:05, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:06, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The media files were created for math flashcards which are being used by a 6th grade public school . If the files are deleted then the students will no longer be able to access these flashcards: http://www.flippity.net/fc.asp?k=1O0GMCDShQ-UE1z_Kn2zkbcpz8mGhK1PP01w5CJZXFYo

The students had brainstorm the terms and I used Adobe Photoshop to create the images of their definitions

Files uploaded by BarbraTA (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents which could be replaced with wiki markup.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of New Caledonia.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:28, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poster, fair-use material copyright of the author of the pocter unknown Motopark (talk) 16:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not published prior to January 1, 1923. No reason to believe the image is public domain. Who ist the author? 77.5.4.71 17:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EÕM images from Flickr Commons

edit

There's no reason to assume that "no known copyright restrictions exist" for these images. They are less than 70 years old, so copyright can't be expired. National Archives of Estonia doesn't claim that it owns the copyright. In their rights statement they only refer to Estonian Copyright Act § 20 which allows usage for the archive itself (and some other institutions). Moreover they state that usage other than usage for "personal, educational and research purposes" is restricted. So their statement doesn't comply with the terms of Flickr Commons and these images shouldn't have been uploaded to Flickr in the first place.

84.50.7.230 16:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo is not PD, nor is evidence present to prove it is made PD by the company. Dqfn13 (talk) 17:15, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is taken form here where it's credited to "bagaicha.com" and tagged with "© Copyright 2008-2015 bagaicha.com, All Rights Reserved.". No permission from the copyright holder. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:18, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be an advertisement; nothing to do with Tile World. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:29, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of the original copyrighted game; I could find no evidence that the company has allowed screenshots under a free license. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 17:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, non-free license, only non-commercial use allowed. Yann (talk) 19:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The background image have copyright. ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 20:23, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Cars - Drive - Who's Gonna Drive You Home or remake, unfree content Herzi Pinki (talk) 20:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from non-free game trailer. Text is ineligible for copyright, but the texture isn't. - hahnchen 20:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 20:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong tag. Not Federal government, but State government. Source says: "Copyright © 2013 by Alabama Judicial System." -- Cirt (talk) 21:02, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong tag. Not Federal government, but county government. Copyvio. Copyright page on source website says: "All content © 2006-2015 Loudoun County, VA and its representatives. All rights reserved." -- Cirt (talk) 21:05, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This 1948 photo is still copyrighted, because its author is unknown. This is the uploader's only contribution.
Эта фотография сделана в 1948-м году и поэтому несвободная, а защищена авторскими правами. Нужно получить согласие автора, а так как фотограф неизвестен, здесь нет другой возможности как удалить фотографию. Taivo (talk) 21:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, considering 33 uploads by this user = 28x high res (4288x in width or height) uploads using a Kodak Easyshare M522, but suddenly and surprisingly 4 files in Facebook resolution and this photo File:Canápolis 1 (MG).jpg in almost thumbnail size (274×206).

Gunnex (talk) 21:52, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy here. Yann (talk) 21:54, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image have copyright, is from Sergio Pérez (see http://unlobogris.deviantart.com/art/Corythosaurus-25932700) Rextron (talk) 21:54, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused since 2012, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:05, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, out of COM:SCOPE must be realistically useful for educational purposes. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:06, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, out of COM:SCOPE must be realistically useful for educational purposes. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:06, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, out of COM:SCOPE must be realistically useful for educational purposes. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, out of COM:SCOPE must be realistically useful for educational purposes. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, out of COM:SCOPE must be realistically useful for educational purposes. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, out of COM:SCOPE must be realistically useful for educational purposes. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, out of COM:SCOPE must be realistically useful for educational purposes. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, out of COM:SCOPE must be realistically useful for educational purposes. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, out of COM:SCOPE must be realistically useful for educational purposes. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, out of COM:SCOPE must be realistically useful for educational purposes. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LaurieKingdon (talk · contribs)

edit

Medium size, no EXIF data, all other uploads deleted as copyvios.

Yann (talk) 22:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, out of COM:SCOPE must be realistically useful for educational purposes. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, out of COM:SCOPE must be realistically useful for educational purposes. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, out of COM:SCOPE must be realistically useful for educational purposes. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Garynevil (talk · contribs)

edit

Unused image, out of COM:SCOPE must be realistically useful for educational purposes.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CrisCM (talk · contribs)

edit

Not own work, bogus license.

Yann (talk) 22:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Clara Kraft (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions (Facebook), missing EXIF,. All files uploaded in a row on 14.06.2013 and are related to a Brazilian drug store, considering also:

Permission needed. Historical photos may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided.

Gunnex (talk) 22:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by File:Portrait of Nicolas Andre (Andry) Wellcome L0000013.jpg. Replaced in all articles. I am the original uploader. Chick Bowen (talk) 22:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, out of COM:SCOPE must be realistically useful for educational purposes. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:15, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, out of COM:SCOPE must be realistically useful for educational purposes. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:15, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, out of COM:SCOPE must be realistically useful for educational purposes. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:15, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW of material on freeware videoplayer. Just because the software is freeware doesn't mean this image is free to copy, Probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:16, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, out of COM:SCOPE must be realistically useful for educational purposes. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:16, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, out of COM:SCOPE must be realistically useful for educational purposes. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:16, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All the other images on the AlJazeera Flickr stream are copyrighted. I was unable to find this one, probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, out of COM:SCOPE must be realistically useful for educational purposes. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly unlikely to be user's own work, these two images are categorized as "screenshots". Probable COM:COPYVIO and unused so out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:20, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well its think its better that someone should delete it anyway,since there are others who can upload a shocker symbol.--Belrien12 (talk) 09:22, 10 February 2015 (UTC)Belrien12--Belrien12 (talk) 09:22, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion Fixertool (talk) 22:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of https://41.media.tumblr.com/44fa06aeb73b32dfa1a23bea4991c5e1/tumblr_n13xjzK2Eg1trqk2xo3_250.png Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image have copyright (made originally by Karen Carr) Rextron (talk) 23:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photos is "Images © Shannon Stapleton and Reuters 2014." print is in museum with policy http://www.911memorial.org/privacy-policy no proof of free license Blue Rasberry (talk) 23:05, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If it is © then  Delete. Vcohen (talk) 07:03, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, as the background photo is copyrighted material. Epic Genius (talk) 15:48, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is from the webpage Dinosaur Central (http://www.dinosaurcentral.com/clipart.php?ClipartSet=3) Rextron (talk) 23:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is actually a Hypsilophodon made by Oscar Sanisidro (http://bioinf3.uab.cat/dinosaures/index.php?Itemid=40&id=37&option=com_content&task=view) Rextron (talk) 23:13, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Lost according to a server bug" accoring to user's talk page. --ghouston (talk) 23:56, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this file is a copyright violation to my music company and record label SURNATURA OFFICIAL (talk) 11:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Bellow the Threshold of originality. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:50, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope FASTILY 06:48, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cbsnews5687 (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF/different cameras, could be found on other web sites.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Very unlikely own work. Previously published, we need permissions to keep it. PierreSelim (talk) 07:22, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 06:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 09:25, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saeed khalili91 (talk · contribs)

edit

Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful

INeverCry 06:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 09:24, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 06:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 09:24, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 06:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 09:24, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 06:52, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 09:24, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The license claims the photo was taken before 1958, which is unlikely, given the subject was born in 1948. Materialscientist (talk) 08:05, 9 February 2015 (UTC) Materialscientist (talk) 08:05, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 09:22, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Surnatura_%26_Signo_Calle.jpg SURNATURA OFFICIAL (talk) 10:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense nomination. This is a Commons document. Green Giant (talk) 09:06, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Syack_%26_Moncho.jpg SURNATURA OFFICIAL (talk) 10:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

this file is a copyright violation to my music company and record label SURNATURA OFFICIAL (talk) 10:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: By Fastily at 06:47, 16 February 2015. Out of project scope. Green Giant (talk) 09:04, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Syack_MC,_Moncho_MC_%26_Goleo_MC.jpg SURNATURA OFFICIAL (talk) 10:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

this file is a copyright violation to my music company and record label SURNATURA OFFICIAL (talk) 10:47, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: By Fastily at 06:47, 16 February 2015. Out of project scope. Green Giant (talk) 09:03, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this file is a copyright violation to my music company and record label SURNATURA OFFICIAL (talk) 10:47, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

USE OF MATERIAL WITHOUT PERMISION MY RECORD LABEL & MUSIC GROUP OWNS ALL RIGHTS TO THIS MATERIAL LATIN REVOLUCION RECORDS (talk) 11:23, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

USE OF MATERIAL WITHOUT PERMISION MY RECORD LABEL & MUSIC GROUP OWNS ALL RIGHTS TO THIS MATERIAL LATIN REVOLUCION RECORDS (talk) 11:25, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: By Fastily at 06:47, 16 February 2015. Out of project scope. Green Giant (talk) 09:02, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want this picture used Ebronkers (talk) 14:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request within 7 days of upload. The original version of this file was good quality. If you wish to keep that version, let me know on my talk page. Green Giant (talk) 09:08, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure what to do with this. This may well be a public domain HABS photo, in which case it would be OK but mislicensed. I seriously doubt the claim of "own work", because it is so similar to File:St. James Roman Catholic Church, Saint James Place, New York, New York County, NY HABS NY,31-NEYO,44-1.tif. Jmabel ! talk 05:41, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This one may or may not be a problem, but we have the very similar HABS image, that is a higher quality photo and show much less convergence of verticals. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:47, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong streat number (not 268a, correct: 268), wrong name of building (not Gemeindezentrum , correct: Pastorat ) and wrong descriptions as well Vitavia (talk) 07:18, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: None of which are reasons to delete the image. Please use {{Rename}} and fix the description yourself. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:48, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is personal POV without any references to the claims of seperatism or autonomy in each region. It mixes - like apples and pears - serious issues, that cause even international tension, with hobbyist movements that are not even taken serious within the regions themselves. Wuselig (talk) 08:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is also File:Active separatist movements in Europe.svg.--Enok (talk) 22:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The File:Active separatist movements in Europe.png is not updated, though some movements seem to be weird to me, like the Castillian separatist movement... but as long as it is reliably referenced, I don't oppose that it is displayed. I'm taking into account the policy Wikipedia:I just don't like it (which prevents removal of content for subjective opinions about issues). If something has to be updated, let's do it, but not dismissing a more updated version, on the behalf of a more obsolete version of it. Mondolkiri1 (talk) 04:11, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It is the missing "reliable reference" that I base the deletion request on, and which makes me not like this image. But it is not a personal dislike, but a dislike, because the image is not up to the standards of Wikipedia to display reliable, unbiased, and well sourced information. --Wuselig (talk) 10:00, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: It is widely in use on various WPs, therefore cannot be deleted except for copyvio. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:50, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by higher quality vector version File:Active separatist movements in Europe.svg. This file is no longer used on any Wikimedia projects. Nominating for deletion, rather than speedy deletion, just in case there is a reason I have overlooked for keeping the original. Rob984 (talk) 10:04, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Question since the original is CC-BY-SA (as opposed to PD), if the SVG is based upon the PNG, is it necessary to keep the file for its contributor history? Storkk (talk) 11:34, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The vector techincally superseded the original one day after it was posted, in September 2013 (by the original uploader). However, changes made to the vector generally just reflected changes made by many contributors to the original. The original was used on Wikipedia up until recently when I changed them all to the vector (since the files are now identical again). So I'm not sure if keeping the contributor history for the original file is necessary. Rob984 (talk) 00:29, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:20, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In part this is a test case as I tagged a windows phone screenshot for deletion yesterday and an admin agreed with me however the uploader pointed to this image and I promised to look into it. It seems to me according to this that this probably should be viewed as a copyright violation. Other images in the categories that this is in have amended the screen items to simply coloured shapes and nothing more. I felt a DR was the right way to go as it is in fairly extensive use on wiki. Herby talk thyme 10:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you point out exactly what is violating the microsoft copyright?? It seems to me that the simple icons (text, the letter "f", and the word "Google") are not copyrightable and besides that, the more complex and/or images in the icons have been replaced by my own icons. Make sure you read the rules about "... simple geometry is ineligible for copyright and therefore in the public domain, because it consists entirely of information that is common property and contains no original authorship." that's also used in the File:Start81.png file. Raysonho (talk) 05:05, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see anything outstanding as a copyright violation. Could you point out something specific. Secondarywaltz (talk) 05:53, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I guess I would say to take a look at the Category:Windows 8 user interface as an example. In every other case the images have had the Microsoft content minimised and there are simple coloured tiles. Again Category:Microsoft Windows 8 shows absolutely minimal MS content and I'm guessing that is for a very good reason. Certainly admins here will delete MS screenshots very regularly. --Herby talk thyme 09:04, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You guess? Don't you know why you nominated this for deletion? Secondarywaltz (talk) 15:38, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Turn of phrase - though your tone could be better. The rationale is that it is unable to be freely licensed as it is copyrighted by Microsoft as per my nomination. I'm sure others will contribute their views too. --Herby talk thyme 16:19, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
My tone? I don't want to have to guess. Could you please point out exactly what you think is copyright so that it could be blurred out? Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:30, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Herby: Again, Microsoft can't copyright tiles or squares. The Windows 8 start screen is just a listing of the icons of the available programs of that machine. And again, text in this photo can't be copyright as it is information. Make sure you know that "the precise appearance of standard operating system widgets in some themes may or may not be copyrightable, as they are purely geometric, which is in the wiki commons rule you referred to.". Raysonho (talk) 03:43, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok - for clarity. I came across this image while following up a similar image that I tagged for copyright violation and it was deleted as such. Had I seen this image, tagged or untagged, while I had admin rights here I would have deleted it without hesitation. However as the image had been here a while, was in use and I've had a break for a year I felt it wise to do this via a DR. Others on Commons with considerable experience wil have their views and I'd like to see what they have to say. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 09:00, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Most likely the image you were referring to did not have all copyrighted icons replaced by free ones. For this photo, I've created my own icons. And I don't know how many times I need to repeat this: simple geometry, and Microsoft can't copyright tiles or squares. Raysonho (talk) 06:59, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: There are a variety of copyrighted elements here: At least one sentence of text. The drawing at the bottom right. The photograph of clouds. Several of the icons. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:55, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Final note: Getty Images has similar photos of the Surface Pro ([5], [6], [7], [8], [9]). Getty is a commercial stock photo agency, with *professional legal teams* and *real reviewers* who know they are doing. I guess I will try to remove some of the *simple icons* with my own ones again, but after that upload is done I will not put in extra effort to take editorial photos for Wikipedia & Commons. It is easier to go through stock photo professionals who know what they are doing than to explain why something is not a real copyright infringement on Wikimedia Commons. A few years ago I stopped actively editing Wikipedia and got back lots of personal time, but I thought that people on Commons at least know what they are doing, yet again seems like I was wrong. Raysonho (talk) 16:01, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
We could argue which of us is right here for a long time -- I see copyrighted material which you ignore. Yes, Getty has many lawyers, and you may be sure that the images they sell have appropriate licenses from Microsoft or other copyright holders. If we were willing to pay Microsoft for a license, I'm sure we could get one, but that's not how Commons -- as opposed to Getty -- works. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:49, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed that people could argue on Wikipedia & Commons for an extended period of time, and that's why I have decided to reduce my effort on Commons. And I don't think you understand how commercial stock photography works, or else you wouldn't say Getty paid Microsoft for a license. Also note that Shutterstock also has similar photos ([10], [11], [12]). While one can always naively argue that the commercial guys are wrong, or that they paid Microsoft/copyright holders money, the fact is simple icons & shapes are not copyrightable, and text that is less than one sentence is not generally copyrightable. Anyway, I will upload a new photo after removing the things that cause concerns this time. In the future I will upload photos with editorial value onto Flickr, which I don't like as much as I can't release photos into the public domain (CC0), but then the time I save could be used for more constructive things. Teaching everyone about what *Incidental Inclusion* is (which is defined as "... it is not an infringement of copyright to incidentally and not deliberately include a work or other subject-matter in another work or other subject-matter" - which easily applies to this case because the icons, even if they were complex enough to fall into the copyrightable category, are only for the start screen in Windows 8, while this work is a photo that illustrates the look & feel of Surface Pro 3.) is just way too much effort for me. Raysonho (talk) 22:37, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image : Commons is not an image hosting website Mike Hayes (talk) 23:17, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use in an article about the person. INeverCry 00:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 10:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Appears to be TV clip or ad. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In looking at another file uploaded by this user I came across this image and felt that, had I seen it when it was uploaded, I would have tagged it as a copyright violation so you can call this an attempt on my part to understand the situation better. To me according to this it would seem that the poster is a copyright violation - the Swatch one although possibly some of the background ones too and I am not aware that this is covered by FOP. Herby talk thyme 10:13, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a photo of a poster. The main subject is the Swatch store, and the "poster" is less than 10% of the photo by area. The "images of posters" guideline is more about taking a photo of the poster, with the poster as the main subject. Raysonho (talk) 05:13, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. The poster is de minimis and not the subject of the picture. Secondarywaltz (talk) 05:50, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: THe poster is clearly the main subject of the image. De minimis applies only in cases where the item can be removed without the removal being noticed. That's clearly not the case here. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing original source, Gryffindor's 'Source=[13]' is dead. And This photo might be counterfeit of Kusakabe Kimbei Art. Anzoon (talk) 19:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 12:38, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bonjour, je sais que dans le cadre d'un salon mon accord n'est pas nécessaire pour publier des photos, mais vous n'êtes pas obligés de publier celles ou je fais des grimaces :/ Bisous ! 90.169.207.219 03:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Not used. Yann (talk) 12:42, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously marked as missing verification for the license, this was replaced by PD-textlogo. As the image contains a non-simple graphic with arranged curves, rather than simple polygons, this goes beyond the conventional interpretation of what is non-copyrightable. (talk) 07:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I don't think it meets COM:TOO#United States... Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:42, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at Omega Globe Design where the logo is simple fonts, polygons and mathematically accurate curved lines, this logo has the same potential for copyright under US law. I have raised this DR as the precautionary principle applies unless we can believe that the release on Flickr was by the copyright holder rather than Flickrwashing. Note that the Flickr account is a single purpose account, as is the account uploading to Commons. -- (talk) 13:56, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 12:43, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect source, probably copyvio; the image seems to float freely on the Internet, so the uploader is certainly not the author 109.100.41.154 08:05, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:44, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The OTRS ticket for this file confirms permission from the uploader. However, we have no licence in respect of the musical score itself. It is unclear who composed the piece, but it is likely that the composer may have died less than 70 years ago. There is more discussion here. MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to say  Keep. This article says it was called "Marsch Impromptu" and was written by "Gottfried Federlein" in 1876 for the "American nation". Most other news articles just say "Gottfried Federlein". The original life identification was for a Gottfried Federlein (1883 - 1952) which would make it still under copyright in Germany, but that cannot be true given the date of the work. The Library of Congress does indeed have an 1876 deposit for a "Marsch Impromptu" composed by a "G Federlein" and printed in New York.[14] The pictured bookplate however clearly states it was Gottlieb Federlein. Gottlieb Federlein appears to be the person mentioned here (another book published in New York in 1899), and apparently lived from 1835 to 1922. According to this page the born-in-1883 Federlein was "born in New York City, the second son of Gottlieb H Federlein, a Jewish organist (student of Rheinberger) and voice teacher, and Ella Harrison, a contralto soloist". Whatever the case, I think the "Gottfried Federlein" mentioned in the news stories is a mistaken name, unless Gottfried/Gottlieb are used interchangeably, and I don't think the born-in-1883 Federlein had anything to do with it. The bottom of the pictured page indicates that it is from the Collection Litolff No. 1189. According to this page, Collection Litolff No. 1189 was printed by Litolff's publishing company, and credits de:Josef Löw (1834 - 1886) as both the composer and arranger. According to this page, Collections No. 1189 and 1190 were published in 1881 in Germany, with Löw as the only author credit. Whichever attribution is correct, it would seem the composer has died -- which I think is reasonable to assume for a work published in 1876 (or 1881 at the latest), and is rather unlikely to have been by someone who has died in the last 70 years. It should certainly be PD-1923 for the U.S. side, at the very least, and that actually does appear to be the country of origin for the original work (though it would be Germany for Löw's arrangement, if that's what it was). Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:24, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the excellent research, Carl. That sounds pretty convincing, and I withdraw the Deletion Request. The short bits of text that appear to have been added later using a manual typewriter are in my view too short to be copyrightable in themselves. I agree we can now  Keep this file. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:35, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
User:Fae noticed that the Library of Congress entry has five pages or so of the actual published sheet music, which to my extremely untrained eye do not seem to match this page at all. Not sure if there were more pages which the Library of Congress does not show (the bookplate mentions three works and at most one is shown), or if perhaps the Löw work is completely different (just having the same title) and the Federlein attribution is a total mistake. Again, doesn't affect the copyright status I don't think (PD either way) but it would be good to get the attribution right. Would be nice if that 1881 publication was available somewhere... Carl Lindberg (talk) 18:50, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bonjour, bâtiment architectural (et unique) français dont l'architecte n'est pas mort depuis plus de 70 ans. Objet principal de la photo. Mith (talk) 12:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:02, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by D.a.kelm (talk · contribs)

edit

I tagged a number of uploads from this user as copyvio from a number of sources, all ultimately related to the Carnegie Moscow Center. I later noticed that one of the files carried this permission: "I am a CMC employee and release the rights to this photo on behalf of the CMC Communications Director. I may be reached at dkelm@carnegie.ru." Is this enough to keep these files, or should we delete them regardless?

Underlying lk (talk) 15:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No. Licenses must come from authorized officials, not merely any employee. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:04, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May be COM:FOP#Colombia/{{FoP-Colombia}}-related which is OK only for works "situated in permanent form in a place open to the public". The photo shows a (IMHO) temporarly installed banner with a photo of en:Gabriel García Márquez (1927—2014), a Colombian writer, most likely installed to honour his death in 04.2014 (the file was uploaded in 07.2014). Unsure if COM:DM applies here. Gunnex (talk) 15:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per above, nominating also:

which might be also critically, considering indoor shot in a Colombian art museum showing artworks with unknown copyright status. Gunnex (talk) 16:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Boa-tarde, Confirmo que essa foto é de minha autoria. Pode ser que essa foto esteja também no meu álbum Flickr (Lais Castro Trajano), talvez com uma licença diferente... Se for por estar no Flickr, eu posso alterar lá a licença. Agora, se quiserem deletar, fiquem à vontade... Obrigada, Lais Castro.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lalaisca (talk • contribs)


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:05, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence for this free creative commons license 188.104.107.173 18:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:12, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Huntster as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Originally published in National Geographic, and only later chosen to be part of the Voyager Golden Record. No evidence this image is freely licensed. Yann (talk) 21:16, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:14, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Herbythyme as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted according to EXIF Yann (talk) 21:51, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:14, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Groupir ! (talk · contribs)

edit

This is nothing against the Commons user. A Flickr user seems to have taken this image from a publication's website and then licensed it as CC. It was uploaded to Commons and confirmed to be CC. Currently a larger, clearer version of the same image can still be found on Lyon Femmes at http://www.lyonfemmes.com/uploads/MURIEL_ROBIN_PENSE_A_EPOUSER_SA_COMPAGNE__1378284211.jpg

Of note, the photo itself was cropped from a larger full length photo which can also be found by doing a Google Images or TinEye search. Also, there is no description or EXIF data with the Flickr image to suggest that the uploader was the creator of the photo.

The Haz talk 22:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:16, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not necessarily PD; I have uploaded a bitmapped image (File:Seal of Strojimir.gif) which replaces the use of this image Zoupan (talk) 08:51, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No evidence of a free license. Yann (talk) 12:47, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Por que é apenas um teste de carregamento de arquivo Gisele furtado (talk) 12:15, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Test. Yann (talk) 12:48, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Tempio civico.jpg Yiyi (talk) 12:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:48, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

substituido este esbozo de escudo por este escudo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parair (talk • contribs) 1989 14:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yo, que soy el autor de la imagen, estoy completamente de acuerdo con que se borre, porque el nuevo escudo subido por Parair es mucho major.--Tiberioclaudio99 (talk) 15:25, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Poor quality, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 12:49, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD:Somalia applies to files taken in Somalia by Somali nationals. However, it is unclear by whom exactly this file was taken. Copyright protection may also be in effect again since the establishment of the Federal Government of Somalia. Middayexpress (talk) 16:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Do not delete. The picture was definitely taken in Somalia as this is a Somali village. It can be checked with Google.maps or Bing.com/maps that this village indeed is Quljeed, see here or here. It was also made by a Somali national, named Cabdi Rashiid Qaado. See: "Pictures Of Quljeed Somaliland By Cabdi Rashiid Qaado" on http://oursurprisingworld.blogspot.nl/ and scroll about halfway down the page. The new Federal Government of Somalia has not (yet) passed any copyright law. Loranchet (talk) 23:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I know the file was taken in Somalia. There's also no evidence of permission for reuse in that blog link. Middayexpress (talk) 00:21, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 12:51, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo is not PD, nor is evidence present to prove it is made PD by the company. Dqfn13 (talk) 17:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:52, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Racconish as no permission (No permission since) Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 17:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The source page shows the CC-BY-SA logo. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 17:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fine for me. Not sure you needed to go through the DR process though Clin. Cheers, — Racconish 📥 17:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 12:53, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Palosirkka as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: proprietary software Seems to be OK: http://jwork.org/rtextdoc/about/ Yann (talk) 19:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like I was wrong here, sorry for the bad noise. I suggest we close this request. Palosirkka (talk) 10:02, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 12:54, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Previous deletion request, resulted to keep

The same reasoning as in this RfD. The station is in Crimea - the territory claimed by both Ukraine and Russia. While in Russia there is Freedom of Panorama for buildings, in Ukraine there is not. Per precautionary principle we need to apply the most strict law - that'd be Ukrainian in the case. Some or perhaps even all files here were already deleted in the past but were batch undeleted when Russian Federation's law allowed FoP for buildings.--BaseSat (talk) 21:13, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BaseSat (talk) 21:13, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

+ Мои фотографии - Вокзал.Симферополь 03.JPG и Вокзал.Симферополь 04.JPG - были загружены в сентябре 2012 года в рамках украинской части конкурса "Вики любит памятники" с использованием соотстветствующего загрузочного шаблона. Информацию о загрузке именно в рамках конкурса можно увидеть на страницах этих фотографий. Украинская сторона в лице жюри конкурса не предъявила никаких претензий к фотографиям. Я искренне не понимаю, почему претензии могли возникнуть сейчас. Мне кажется, логично для начала обратиться с претензиями к тем людям, которые отвечали за формирование конкурсных (загрузочных) списков, а не к юзерам, которые руководствовались этими списками, отправляя фотографии на конкурс. Екатерина Борисова (talk) 22:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep This project is ridiculous. No one in their right mind will sue Wikimedia or any other organization for that matter simply because an image of a railway station appears on a website's servers. DDima 22:15, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, but these are not valid arguments. --BaseSat (talk) 00:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
     Keep At the moment in this territory is applying only copyright law of Russian Federation --Butko (talk) 07:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    But per Ukrainian law it isn't so. And Ukraine's position in the conflict is backed up by many countries including the USA, where Wikimedia Commons is located. --BaseSat (talk) 00:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Поезжайте в Симферополь и расскажите там кому-нибудь об этом – думаю, мы вас больше не увидим, и это к лучшему, наверное: меньше работы по переносу фотографий будет. С тем же успехом можно "превентивно" применять эстонские законы к объектам, расположенным в Печорах, поскольку Печорский район формально остаётся предметом вялотекущего территориального спора между Эстонией и Россией. --Alexander (talk) 19:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Однако сервера, где размещены эти фото, расположены в США. Поэтому здесь применяется законодальство США. А они признают Крым украинским. Так что поезжайте в Вашингтон, убедите господина Обаму, что Крым ваш, тогда поговорим.--Anatoliy (talk) 19:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Это не повод для флуда на политические темы, тем более, что лично я видеть Крым российским совершенно не хочу. Если здесь применяются только и исключительно американские законы, то они вообще не регламентируют копирайт за пределами территории США. Если речь идёт о местных законах, то они на сегодняшний день в Крыму российские – это факт, который мне лично (как, видимо, и Вам) не нравится, но он есть, и спорить с ним глупо. --Alexander (talk) 20:43, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Afaik there are currently some plans for establishing commercial FoP in Ukraine. Anybody know the status at the moment? --A.Savin 10:38, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    It will be hearing in parliament maybe next month.--Anatoliy (talk) 12:02, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
     Keep Увидел пока одно своё фото. Это: File:Железнодорожный вокзал в Симферополе.JPG. Меня интересует причина, по которой файл выставлен на удаление? Alexander (talk) 19:09, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    На фото изображено здание вокзала в симферополе (К.О.) Крым сейчас принадлежит Украине по мнению одних стран, и Российской Федерации по мнению других стран. Если рассматривать фото с точки зрения российского законодательства, то начиная 1 октября 2014 с фото всё ок, если же рассматривать с точки зрения украиского законодательства то для публикации такого фото с разрешеним на коммерческое использование требуется разрешение от архитектора здания. На Викискладе действует превентивный принцип, по этому следует рассматривать ситуацию с точки зрения более строгого законодательства, которым в данном случае является украинское. --BaseSat (talk) 00:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    На Викискладе полно изображений различных украинских зданий. Никаких разрешений на публикацию фото от архитекторов естественно нет. Например вокзал в Киеве (File:Kiev-Passazhirskiy railway station, Kiev, Ukraine.jpg) или это. Проблема высосана из пальца.Alexander (talk) 08:42, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Не переживайте, на материковой Украине BaseSat орудует не менее интенсивно. --A1 (talk) 11:26, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • We can support FoP new regulations in Ukrainian law here: ht tp://freepanorama.org.ua/ --Halavar (talk) 19:18, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Crimea is currently using Russian law. In addition, there is not much to copyright on many of these pictures. Yann (talk) 12:58, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: And what about last paragraph of Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Russia? It states as per precautionary principle, images of knowingly unfree Crimean buildings should not be uploaded to Commons.--Anatoliy (talk) 13:07, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All files show exterior and interior architecture of this Crimean railway station. There is no freedom of panorama of any sort in Ukraine. While the region is under de facto administration of Russian Federation, according to COM:FOP Russia: Following the Commons precautionary principle, images of knowingly unfree Crimean buildings should not be uploaded to Commons. See Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2014/09#Buildings in Crimea. And unfortunately, architect w:Alexey Dushkin is not yet dead for more than 70 years.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:00, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Comment As 1951+71(I always +1 for these "copyright terms" because I don't know which country don't rule it as "until the end of the year")=2022, I agree to temporary delete them for 5 months, and automatically restore on 1 Jan 2022, but then I wonder if we can avoid such "temporary deletions" or not, based on "utilitarian objects" as mentioned in COM:FOP Ukraine section? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:21, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @Liuxinyu970226: the building is not purely utilitarian. It has distinct architectural characteristics (not to mention that an architect designed it, not an engineering firm of some sort). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:55, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per previous decision of User:Yann, Crimea is currently using Russian law.. --Ellywa (talk) 23:31, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Andre Kritzinger as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Delete - Replaced by fair use image File:Transkei Defence Force Medal, 1976.jpg. Please delete in terms of Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion: 2. Fair use content. Yann (talk) 22:41, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation, uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 20:51, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Andre Kritzinger as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Delete - Replaced by fair use image File:Military Rule Medal.jpg. Please delete in terms of Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion: 2. Fair use content. Yann (talk) 22:42, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation, uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 20:51, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Andre Kritzinger as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Delete - Replaced by fair use image File:General Service Medal, Bophuthatswana.jpg. Please delete in terms of Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion: 2. Fair use content. Yann (talk) 22:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation, uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 20:51, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD:Somalia applies to files taken in Somalia by Somali nationals. However, it is unclear where exactly and by whom this file was taken. Copyright protection may also be in effect again since the establishment of the Federal Government of Somalia. Middayexpress (talk) 16:23, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 15:24, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Il file è difettoso ed è stato sostituito da questo. Roberto.Amerighi (talk) 03:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and merged to the new file. Green Giant (talk) 19:52, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: Uploaded by Lalaisca (talk · contributions · Statistics) in 02.2014 as "own work", the photo was posted before that date by "Lais Castro" (most likely the uploader, most of his uploads are also available on his Flickrstream maintained by "Lais Castro Trajano") on his blog in 01.2014 via http://patrialais.blogspot.de/2014/01/recife-historias-da-cidade-viii-bairro.html = http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-1M6lRHBFBAI/UswgWIczq9I/AAAAAAAAKlg/AQ9rJqD7Z8g/s1600/Leica+025.jpg, giving credits to "Fotos de Thaís Gualter". Permission via COM:OTRS needed. Gunnex (talk) 16:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Boa-tarde, Não sei bem como funciona isso aqui, mas o que posso dizer é que não infringi nenhuma regra de postagem. Todas as fotos que posto são de minha autoria. Pode ser que essa foto esteja também no meu álbum Flickr (Lais Castro Trajano), talvez com uma licença diferente... Poderiam me dizer exatamente porque estão banindo a foto? Se for por estar no Flickr, eu posso alterar lá a licença. Agora, se quiserem deletar, fiquem à vontade... mas que a foto é minha, lá isso é! Obrigada, Lais Castro.

Mea culpa! Desconsiderem o que escrevi anteriormente. Lembrei! Realmente, essa foto foi feita com a minha câmera, porém pela minha amiga Thais Gualter. Pode deletar, peço desculpas! E se lá no Flickr está como minha, vou lá imediatamente, para corrigir o erro. Grata, Lais Castro.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lalaisca (talk • contribs)


Deleted: Uploader has requested deletion because the photographer was his/her friend. Green Giant (talk) 19:40, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by CFF-FT as Speedy (Löschen) Yann (talk) 22:39, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Unused, uploader request. --Sebari (talk) 21:16, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader request within seven days of upload. Green Giant (talk) 19:37, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded by Xocolatl with a clearly inappropriate license - 1907 + unknown author doesn't = PD-old-100 --78.43.147.232 20:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:09, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Andre Kritzinger as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Delete - Replaced by fair use image File:Military Rule Medal.jpg. Please delete in terms of Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion: 2. Fair use content. Yann (talk) 22:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:13, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Andre Kritzinger as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Delete - Replaced by fair use image File:SAW John Chard Medal a.jpg. Please delete in terms of Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion: 2. Fair use content. Yann (talk) 22:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:13, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Andre Kritzinger as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Delete - Replaced by fair use image File:SAW John Chard Medal b.jpg. Please delete in terms of Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion: 2. Fair use content. Yann (talk) 22:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:13, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful own work on this image. If one looks at en:File:Provost T5 YZB TGT.JPG there is another photo uploaded by this individual, and which is clearly someone elses work. EXIF etc indicate different cameras, the nature of the shot, etc, indicate this is likely not the work of this person. 186.145.118.218 00:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:42, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not necessarily PD; I have uploaded a bitmapped image (File:Seal of Strojimir.gif) which replaces the use of this image Zoupan (talk) 08:51, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The copyright of your image is the same, and PNG should be used instead of GIF. Yann (talk) 12:46, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 21:42, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Palosirkka as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: proprietary software Unclear licensing, see http://jwork.org/scavis/index.php/license Yann (talk) 19:24, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I don't see much that is copyrightable here. --Sebari (talk) 21:15, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I agree Natuur12 (talk) 21:42, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]